Legal Profession

The Supreme Court's draft AI rules for courts have stalled since July over one clause: must lawyers disclose every use of AI in a filing? SCAORA and a sitting judge say no.

The days of manual precedent hunting are fading. This guide explores the massive shift in 2026, breaking down how Artificial Intelligence is acting as a "force multiplier" for Indian lawyers, from automating due diligence to predicting case outcomes.

In a notable move toward inclusivity within India’s legal profession, the Supreme Court on November 3 urged the Bar Council of India (BCI) to explore the feasibility of introducing reservations for lawyers with disabilities in bar associations and bar councils across the country. The suggestion, though not a binding order, represents a significant moral and institutional push from the apex court for the legal fraternity to become more representative. The bench, while hearing a matter...

The Karnataka High Court has cautioned against over-reliance on AI in the legal profession, asserting that "too much dependence on AI will destroy the profession." This observation arose during a hearing where the Central Government highlighted instances of "fake judgments being used in cases through Artificial Intelligence." Justice M. Nagaprasanna emphasized that AI cannot replace critical thinking, ethical reasoning, and thorough verification in legal practice. This stance aligns with global.

Review petitions filed challenging India's 3-year Bar practice rule for judicial service, citing fairness and constitutional issues.

Supreme Court slams lawyers for chaotic, out-of-turn submissions—warning such conduct harms clients more than it helps.

How AI is reshaping legal practice in India faster research, smarter tools, real challenges.

Supreme Court rules that legal services by advocates are excluded from the Consumer Protection Act, highlighting their unique role.